Stealing breeds more stealing, and with it, grows the shamelessness.
On Mamuka Mamulashvili and the Georgian Culture of Theft and Shamelessness
Mamuka Mamulashvili and the Georgian Culture of Theft and Shamelessness
On his very recent interview on YouTube, this BASTARD, this cowardly thief, Mamuka Mamulashvili, like half his fascist country's population, claims that the "Abkhazians are actually a Georgian tribe, that today’s Abkhazians are Circassians, and that they were settled in Abkhazia by the Russians during the Soviet era." This bastard, whose IQ is lower than their shoe size, not content with stealing money, is now also attempting to steal the our ethnic identity and our history. This dishonourable and immoral individual perfectly reflects the characteristics of the majority of his society.
+ What AW Receives from Georgians Daily
+ Georgian Nationalism: Fabricating History and Denying Abkhazian Identity
+ Responses to Some Fanciful Ideas of a “Historian” from Paris, Badri Gogia
It is shameful even to have to state these simple facts:
The Abkhazians are not part of the Georgian ethnicity.
The Abkhazians are the indigenous people of Abkhazia.
Yet, most of members of this immoral society have been parroting this ridiculous claim since the 1950s, a claim that no one but themselves takes seriously.
Pavle Ingoroqva, who argued that today’s Abkhazians arrived in Transcaucasia only in the 17th century, displacing and taking the name of the ‘true’ Abkhazians, who were allegedly a Georgian tribe. This slander was revived in the fervour of Georgian nationalism from 1988 and is widely believed by many ordinary, low-IQ Georgians, who for this reason still consider the Abkhazia is not the native lands of the Abkhazians.
+ Zviad Gamsakhurdia: “Abkhaz Nation Doesn’t Exist!”
+ The Ibero-Caucasian hypothesis and the historiography of Abkhazia, by Kevin Tuite
+ Questions of Abkhazian history in the book by P. Ingorokva ‘Georgi Merchule - Georgian writer of the 10th century’, by Zurab V. Anchabadze
+ Rewriting History? A Critique of Modern Georgian Historiography on Abkhazia
After the Abkhazians were exiled from their homeland following the Russo-Caucasus wars, which ended in 1864 (during which the Georgians fought alongside the Russians), and the Russo-Ottoman War of 1877-78, the Georgians planned to settle in the vacated lands. And that is precisely what they became.
+ Who should be settled in Abkhazia? By Jakob Gogebashvili (1877)
+ Three Extracts from the Georgian Newspapers Droeba and Iveria+ Georgii Tsereteli (1879): It’s time that we grab new territories in the Caucasus
The mass immigration of Kartvelians (mostly Mingrelians) dates back to the late 1930s. At that time, during the Stalin-Beria Terror in Abkhazia, the Abkhaz script was altered from a Roman to a Georgian base. Abkhaz-language schools were abruptly closed in 1945-46, followed by a ban on broadcasting and publications. The Abkhazians as a nation were on the verge of facing deportation (like the many other peoples exiled by Stalin, from the Koreans in the late 1930s to the Greeks of Abkhazia in the late 1940s), and as a 'scholarly' justification for this, the literary historian Pavle Ingoroqva was tasked with arguing that the Abkhazians only arrived in Abkhazia in the 17th century, conquering the ‘original’ Abkhazians of history, who were supposedly a ‘Georgian’ tribe.
Despite Ingorokva's claim being riddled with inaccuracies and gaps, it was praised by several prominent Georgian scholars from various fields. However, it was strongly criticised by both Georgian and Abkhaz scholars, including the well-known linguist and Abkhazologist Ketevan Lomtatidze, as well as Nikoloz Berdzenishvili, Georgy Soselia, Khukhut Bgazhba, and Zurab Achba [Anchabadze].
By then, major and respected historians like Ivane Javakhishvili and Simon Janashia were no longer around. This absence meant that Ingorokva’s hypothesis, especially among scholars and writers who weren’t specialists in Abkhazology, was enthusiastically accepted, leading to only weak pushback against his ideas. So much so that, when faced with criticism, Ingorokva’s supporters portrayed him as a patriot being punished for his stance. They blamed the Georgian historians who challenged him, claiming they were under pressure from the authorities. Georgian history professor Nodar Lomouri, in his book Simon Kaukhchishvili, touched on this: “Georgian historians didn’t support Pavle Ingorokva because, from a scholarly point of view, it just wasn’t possible.”
Eventually, this slander was revived during the peak of Georgian nationalism from 1988 and is widely believed by many ordinary Georgians, and bastards like this Mamuka, who still, for this reason, regard the Abkhazia is not the native lands of the Abkhazians.
This BASTARD, Mamuka, and majority of his fellow citizens, with an IQ smaller than their age, claims that the "Abkhazians speak a language close to Adyghe (Circassian) language" to support their so-called arguments.
They probably believe that Circassian and Abkhaz are mutually intelligible languages. According to this fools, the Abkhazians were resettled (or somehow settled) by Russia during the Soviet period (though many claim it was in the 17th and 18th centuries).... And somehow, they instantly developed an entirely different language. Not only that, but they supposedly managed to assimilate the Georgians (the ‘real Abkhazians’) at the speed of light and steal their name.
These fools who have no clue how languages develop over time or the stages involved, let alone the concept of language families, endoethnonyms, exoethnonyms, just keep repeating the same nonsense. They have never bothered to read a credible source or ask someone knowledgeable. It's a never-ending cycle of stupidity.
Even your enemy should be intelligent and honourable. And then look at ours.... A bunch of idiots. So we have to explain even the simplest facts over and over again.
Note: Some might find the language in this post harsh, but research shows that swearing can be an effective way to convey strong emotions, emphasise honesty and increased attention. The use of such language in this context serves to emphasise the intensity of the message. Swearing is not merely about being offensive but can have a powerful rhetorical effect, helping to convey truth and honesty in a direct and impactful way.